|
milodara93 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@warlocker4life Wow whats the problem? stop acting all mean dude idc if your japan or american
warlocker4life (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@milodara93 ROFL. you have no F****** idea about your history, shame on you. You belive what you heard, not what you discovered yourself. I spit on you.
qwertypoiu4321 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@JDubs878 "okay for Germany and Japan to destroy your friends"Friends? The US Federal State can not have force you to have 'friends' that the US can enslave you into the military to go get murdered over. Or embezzle money from you to throw at them. That is one of the two reasons 911 happened.Germany and Japan were never--and were never going to be--direct threats to any US citizens. If it were not for the US helping their 'friend' in WWI, we would not even know whom Hitler is.
JDubs878 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@qwertypoiu4321So by you're logic, its a okay for Germany and Japan to destroy your friends in Europe and Asia because they aren't directly attacking you as yet? How stupid is that??What kind of friend are you when you allow your Allies to fall without even trying to help them? And what kind of incompetent government are you when you can't foresee the near future where allowing aggressor nations to do what they wish is not a good idea? If you ran the US back then, we'd have been FUCKED.
qwertypoiu4321 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@JDubs878 "if someone doesn't threaten you right away,"Japan, Germany and Italy were never a threat to the US. Under your logic Japan was justified in attacking the US since Japan was in danger from the US. Under your logic Germany should have attacked us in the 1910's, Japan, Vietnam, Korea, Cambodia, Russia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Somalia, and Lebanon should or should have attacked the US since they were--or are--in possible, unverifiable danger in the possible future.
JDubs878 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@qwertypoiu4321So wait your saying if someone doesn't threaten you right away, then you should do nothing and let the aggressor do what they want?All of South East Asia was in peril because of the Japs and could've fallen to them including Australia. Then what? The US would be in danger then and you'd have to fight an even larger enemyIts like saying your next door neighbour's house is on fire but since your house is fine now, then you shouldn't have to help your neighbour to fight their fire
qwertypoiu4321 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@JDubs878 When did Japan attack the US to deserve economic and political strangulation to the point of non-existence? I am fairly sure they never did ANYTHING to the US to deserve ANY such actions...
JDubs878 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@qwertypoiu4321Did you miss what I wrote before?! They FUCKING RAPED, KILLED AND PLUNDERED ALL OVER ASIA! Are you saying that isn't justification enough for SOMEONE to take some sort of action to try and stop the Japs?Maybe if the Japs didn't attack other countries, there wouldn't have been any sanctions. Do you even know that the Japs attacked other nations LONG BEFORE THERE WERE ANY SANCTIONS? Read some history as to how much foreign land the Japs occupied EVEN BEFORE WWII.
milodara93 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@warlocker4life xD japan wanted the war USA didn't want war but then they bombed USA in surprise and USA wasn't ready then USA had revange or something now there in a state of war and they use the N.U.C.K on japan and franch declare war with japan because USA and franch are allys then the USA won the war.
qwertypoiu4321 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@JDubs878 "US wouldn't have imposed sanctions"What did Japan do to the US to justify sanctions?"how were the Japs trying to 'defend themselves'?"They were defending themselves against the political and economic coercive warfare of the US and Britain, which gravely menaced the EXISTENCE of Japan. | 
